
Tilbudsguide, uge 45, 2019
And og æg!
Tilbudsguide, uge 44, 2019
Svinemørbrad og mandler!
Tilbudsguide, uge 43, 2019
Havregryn og oksefilet!
Tilbudsguide, uge 42, 2019
Olivenolie, granatæble og mango!
Vi har 69534 registrerede brugere. Nyeste registrede medlem er JosephSoync
Vores medlemmer har i alt skrevet 2050005 indlæg i 100495 emner
1 nye indlæg i dag



I believe hip thrusters are a great exercise for learning how to use ones glutes properly. I often recommend them to people when I notice they have problems pulling their hips forward on a lift, especially during strongman training where this is especially important.
However, after this problem is fixed, I see no reason to keep loading them. VERY few people actually have weak glutes (as evidenced by the speed of progression on hip thrusters) but many people don't know how to fire them. After you learn to fire them, if they aren't a weak link, why would I prioritize training time towards them?
Hell, if we're to believe Bret Contreras' EMG studies (which I don't) then the squat, deadlift, and other movements don't even require that much glute activation to be performed properly.
Anecdotally, when these first became popular, I knew a lot of competitors that started doing these, including multiple that worked up to over 500 and one that posted a video doing 585 for reps. None of them do them today, and none of them believed they got any carryover out of them.
They are a great exercise to load to a certain point, but after that point is no longer a weakness, focus elsewhere, IMO.

hr_bjoern skrev:Gå dog ned i bodyman og få dine power perfect byttet. Det burde der være tid til, når du ikke laver noget hele dagen!
Angående din hip thrusts:I believe hip thrusters are a great exercise for learning how to use ones glutes properly. I often recommend them to people when I notice they have problems pulling their hips forward on a lift, especially during strongman training where this is especially important.
However, after this problem is fixed, I see no reason to keep loading them. VERY few people actually have weak glutes (as evidenced by the speed of progression on hip thrusters) but many people don't know how to fire them. After you learn to fire them, if they aren't a weak link, why would I prioritize training time towards them?
Hell, if we're to believe Bret Contreras' EMG studies (which I don't) then the squat, deadlift, and other movements don't even require that much glute activation to be performed properly.
Anecdotally, when these first became popular, I knew a lot of competitors that started doing these, including multiple that worked up to over 500 and one that posted a video doing 585 for reps. None of them do them today, and none of them believed they got any carryover out of them.
They are a great exercise to load to a certain point, but after that point is no longer a weakness, focus elsewhere, IMO.
Jeg er enig, da hip thrusts ikke har den store overførbarhed. Med mindre man snakker hypertrofi i glutes, der kan hip thrusts stadig være gode. Men hvis det er et fokuspunkt, så bør du lære Glute ham gastoc raise, good mornings og rumænsk dødløft.

dirtypete skrev:hr_bjoern skrev:Gå dog ned i bodyman og få dine power perfect byttet. Det burde der være tid til, når du ikke laver noget hele dagen!
Angående din hip thrusts:I believe hip thrusters are a great exercise for learning how to use ones glutes properly. I often recommend them to people when I notice they have problems pulling their hips forward on a lift, especially during strongman training where this is especially important.
However, after this problem is fixed, I see no reason to keep loading them. VERY few people actually have weak glutes (as evidenced by the speed of progression on hip thrusters) but many people don't know how to fire them. After you learn to fire them, if they aren't a weak link, why would I prioritize training time towards them?
Hell, if we're to believe Bret Contreras' EMG studies (which I don't) then the squat, deadlift, and other movements don't even require that much glute activation to be performed properly.
Anecdotally, when these first became popular, I knew a lot of competitors that started doing these, including multiple that worked up to over 500 and one that posted a video doing 585 for reps. None of them do them today, and none of them believed they got any carryover out of them.
They are a great exercise to load to a certain point, but after that point is no longer a weakness, focus elsewhere, IMO.
Jeg er enig, da hip thrusts ikke har den store overførbarhed. Med mindre man snakker hypertrofi i glutes, der kan hip thrusts stadig være gode. Men hvis det er et fokuspunkt, så bør du lære Glute ham gastoc raise, good mornings og rumænsk dødløft.
Seems legit. Tager jeg lige op til overvejelse. Jeg er dog stadig af den overbevisning at det er en fantastisk øvelse til glutes og hams, men det virker snart fjollet at ligge og støde så mange kilo i vejret uden den store anstrengelse. Vil du med ned i SPH ved 12-13 tiden i morgen? Skal arbejde kl 17, så vi skal tidligt afsted.. Har du nogle håndklemmer jeg må låne btw?





hr_bjoern skrev:Kom du så også ud og løbe, i går aftes?



dirtypete skrev:Han tror selv han ligner en neandertaler. Men det gør han ikke!

hr_bjoern skrev:dirtypete skrev:Han tror selv han ligner en neandertaler. Men det gør han ikke!
Det glæder mig at høre! Det look er ikke in længere...






hr_bjoern skrev:Fornemt maxløft, det må jeg sige Pete! En stærk dreng, du er.
Du vipper røven op, neglicerer benene og trækker størstedelen med lænden - men sådan ser et maxløft ofte ud, så det er sgu OK. Godt løft, men det er fandme dumt, at du insisterer på at Hjalte skal filme det forfra

dirtypete skrev:hr_bjoern skrev:Fornemt maxløft, det må jeg sige Pete! En stærk dreng, du er.
Du vipper røven op, neglicerer benene og trækker størstedelen med lænden - men sådan ser et maxløft ofte ud, så det er sgu OK. Godt løft, men det er fandme dumt, at du insisterer på at Hjalte skal filme det forfra
Havde lige løftet 160 kg, der synes jeg selv teknikken er meget flottere. Men som du selv siger, så bliver det sgu svært når det bliver virkelig tungt, 170 var virkelig tungt. Fik instant propper i ørerne da jeg løftede de 160, det var fandme spøjst. Mht. benene ved jeg sgu ikke, de var måske færdige efter PR i squat, som i øvrigt også var åndssvagt tungt.
Forfra, bagfra, det' ligemeget.


hr_bjoern skrev:dirtypete skrev:hr_bjoern skrev:Fornemt maxløft, det må jeg sige Pete! En stærk dreng, du er.
Du vipper røven op, neglicerer benene og trækker størstedelen med lænden - men sådan ser et maxløft ofte ud, så det er sgu OK. Godt løft, men det er fandme dumt, at du insisterer på at Hjalte skal filme det forfra
Havde lige løftet 160 kg, der synes jeg selv teknikken er meget flottere. Men som du selv siger, så bliver det sgu svært når det bliver virkelig tungt, 170 var virkelig tungt. Fik instant propper i ørerne da jeg løftede de 160, det var fandme spøjst. Mht. benene ved jeg sgu ikke, de var måske færdige efter PR i squat, som i øvrigt også var åndssvagt tungt.
Forfra, bagfra, det' ligemeget.
Jeg synes sgu det er OK. Så du stjerner bagefter?










Brugere der læser dette forum: Ingen tilmeldte brugere og 76 gæster