Jenslyn87 skrev:Jeg har hørt Hippos argumenter flere gange, men også argumentet om, at man med erfaring og neurale tilpasninger bliver i stand til at rekruttere flere muskelfibre, hvilket kommer til at gøre sig for nogle mere udmattende træninger. Man bliver altså i stand til at sønderbanke musklen i langt højere grad, end man gjorde, da éns primære fokus ved squat bare var ikke at falde forover ;)

Ved fx bænkpres ser man gerne, at nybegyndere næsten ikke kan holde stangen stabilt; de har altså ikke udviklet det, man populært kalder mind-to-muscle connection eller måske bare en slags motorisk specialisering på godt dansk. De, der har trænet længe og er bekendt med de forskellige bevægelsesmønstre, skal ikke (aktivt) korrigere, så vægten ikke flyver ad Himmerlands til. Man kan altså koncentrere sig om at træne musklen - ikke bevægelsen!

Edit: Som også forklares ovenfor

Because a novice lifts weights that are light relative to his genetic potential for strength and power development, the rate of recovery following training can be rapid. Essentially, this trainee can
recover from a single training session in a period of 24 to 72 hours. The novice trainee can train "heavy" on Monday and be ready to go heavy again on Wednesday.

These trainees are quite far away from their genetic potential, and therefore lack the strength and the neural efficiency to generate a stress heavy enough to impede rapid recovery. For them, "heavy" is not really heavy.

At the same time that strength and power are improving, recovery ability is improving too. Recovery processes are as trainable as any other physical parameter, and this is an extremely significant factor in training progress. But it is important to remember that recovery processes can always be exceeded by the injudicious application of training stress. Recovery must occur before progress can be made.