
Tilbudsguide, uge 45, 2019
And og æg!
Tilbudsguide, uge 44, 2019
Svinemørbrad og mandler!
Tilbudsguide, uge 43, 2019
Havregryn og oksefilet!
Tilbudsguide, uge 42, 2019
Olivenolie, granatæble og mango!
Vi har 69544 registrerede brugere. Nyeste registrede medlem er JosephSoync
Vores medlemmer har i alt skrevet 2050006 indlæg i 100495 emner
0 nye indlæg i dag



LWK skrev:Begge tilfælde er selvfølgelig tænkt som at man har korrekt teknik.
Hvilket belaster knæet mindst 90 grader eller ATG? Og der må da være et svar på hvilken af øvelserne der belaster knæet mindst..



LWK skrev:Tak for budet Sienz
Jeg er enig med dig lige indtil det med rebounden, kunne forestille mig det satte stor stress på knæet...
Men ja, vi mangler lige at få et par af de erfarne herrer på banen..








Legend skrev:Mit ord er lov!
Squat til 90 grader belaster knæet mere end squat til under parallel.

LWK skrev:Legend skrev:Mit ord er lov!
Squat til 90 grader belaster knæet mere end squat til under parallel.
I need da science.









New Dude skrev:"Although the loads lifted in the current study (approximately 1.5 times BW) are higher than most rehabilitation patients will experience, they are typical loads for strength and power athletes while performing the squat and LP exercises. However, performing the squat, LPH, and LPL at greater knee flexion angles may not be problematic for athletes with healthy knees, as long as heavy loads are not used excessively. Interestingly, PF compressive forces have been shown to remain relatively constant or slightly decrease beyond 85–90°KA (11,21) (Figs. 8 and 9). Hence, patellofemoral stress may decrease with greater than 90°KA, because patellofemoral contact area continues to increase as knee flexion increases (14)".
http://www.mlmixrun.com.br/artigos/Effects_of_technique_variations_on_knee.pdf
Kan uddybe senere hvis det ønskes.

There tends to be an irrational fear associated with deeper-than-parallel
squats, even though most of this is based on theoretical analysis and is
usually contradicted by clinical studies which show that even more knee
injuries occur in activities which do not flex the knee anywhere near
parallel (such as running and jumping). Others show that partial squats can
traumatize the knees even more than full squats!
Do the critics not appreciate that full squats executed under appropriate
control throughout the movement actually produce adaptation (that is what all
training is about, anyway!), enhanced strength, better stability and greater
resistance to unexpected loading? That is what the principle of Gradual
Progressive Overload is about, isn't it?

Brugere der læser dette forum: Ingen tilmeldte brugere og 4 gæster