Bruger login







Tilbudsguide, uge 45, 2019
And og æg!

Tilbudsguide, uge 44, 2019
Svinemørbrad og mandler!

Tilbudsguide, uge 43, 2019
Havregryn og oksefilet!

Tilbudsguide, uge 42, 2019
Olivenolie, granatæble og mango!


Statistik

Vi har 69544 registrerede brugere. Nyeste registrede medlem er JosephSoync

Vores medlemmer har i alt skrevet 2050006 indlæg i 100495 emner

0 nye indlæg i dag


Online
I alt: 1125
Medlemmer: 3
Skjulte: 0
Gæster: 1122

Følg bodybuilding.dk på

Pullups smalt vs bredt grep

Udskriv emne


Træning for større muskler og/eller en mere veltrænet krop

Tilbage til Fitness & bodybuilding





Hej! Jeg har et spørgsmål angående pullups med fokus på lats. Hvad ville være optimalt at køre, pullups med bredt eller smalt grep? Personligt syntes jeg at bredt grep er svære at udføre end smalt. Nogen som kan forklare hvor smalt er nemmere end bredt?
 
Reputation point: 5
 
Indlæg: 2541
Tilmeldt: 15. maj 2011, 17:35
 
Logbog: Vis logbog
Galleri: Intet galleri
Kostplan: Vis kostplan



synes close grip med neutralt greb rammer lats godt :)
Brugeravatar
 
Reputation point: 134
 
Indlæg: 7407
Tilmeldt: 29. mar 2011, 23:18
 
Træner her: FitnessDK Vallensbæk
Fjerritslev Motioncenter
The Gym
 
Styrkeliste
- Bænkpres: 104.50
- Squat: 132.50
- Dødløft: 167.50
 
Logbog: Vis logbog
Galleri: Intet galleri
Kostplan: Vis kostplan



Ved smalt greb (chinups) bruger man i højere grad biceps sammen med ryggen, og derfor er den noget lettere.
Af samme grund er pullups med bredt greb bedre som ren rygøvelse.
Brugeravatar
 
Reputation point: 0
 
Indlæg: 1268
Tilmeldt: 5. sep 2011, 18:49
Geografisk sted: Aalborg
 
Logbog: Vis logbog
Galleri: Intet galleri
Kostplan: Vis kostplan



PKloeve skrev:Ved smalt greb (chinups) bruger man i højere grad biceps sammen med ryggen, og derfor er den noget lettere.
Af samme grund er pullups med bredt greb bedre som ren rygøvelse.

Tak :)
 
Reputation point: 5
 
Indlæg: 2541
Tilmeldt: 15. maj 2011, 17:35
 
Logbog: Vis logbog
Galleri: Intet galleri
Kostplan: Vis kostplan



det ved jeg da nu ikke. jeg kan tage 6 med close grip 7 med bredt greb :D? altså ikke helt bredt, men noget bredere end skulderbredde :D
Brugeravatar
 
Reputation point: 134
 
Indlæg: 7407
Tilmeldt: 29. mar 2011, 23:18
 
Træner her: FitnessDK Vallensbæk
Fjerritslev Motioncenter
The Gym
 
Styrkeliste
- Bænkpres: 104.50
- Squat: 132.50
- Dødløft: 167.50
 
Logbog: Vis logbog
Galleri: Intet galleri
Kostplan: Vis kostplan



The Myth of Wide-grip Superiority
One myth that has held back the development of lats the world over is the persistent idea that using a wide grip on chins and pulldowns is the best way to build wider lats. This myth probably has its origins in the fact that using a wide grip on any vertical pulling motion will selectively recruit the smaller upper back muscles like the teres major and minor, the upper portion of the traps, and the rhomboids.

When a bodybuilder feels these smaller muscle groups at the top of the back working, he often assumes he is making his lats wider. But the lats actually originate under the armpits and insert near the waist. Using a wide grip does not provide anywhere near a full range of motion for them. A narrower grip, in contrast, allows both a better stretch and a more complete contraction. If you don’t believe me, pantomime two types of pulldowns right now as you read this, doing your best to contract the lats as hard as possible: a wide-grip pulldown and a narrow, underhand grip. I guarantee you that you will feel a more powerful contraction of the lats with the narrow underhand grip.

In my early career, I experimented with various types of grips, and I found that using a closer grip with the hands either parallel (facing each other) or fully supinated (underhand) actually provided the best contraction and most complete range of motion for the lats. Throughout my Mr. Olympia reign, I never did a single set of wide-grip chins or lat pulldowns. My two choices for vertical pulling were always a narrow underhand grip for lat pulldowns, which I would go up to 400 pounds on, and the Hammer Strength Iso-lateral pulldown machine.


Taget fra en artikel af Dorian Yates. Han mener personligt selv wide grip ikke udvikler lats som et smallere greb gør.
Brugeravatar
 
Reputation point: 15
 
Indlæg: 1406
Tilmeldt: 13. jul 2011, 23:18
 
Træner her: Sportshøjskolen
 
Styrkeliste
- Bænkpres: 130.00
- Squat: 165.00
- Dødløft: 192.50
 
Logbog: Vis logbog
Galleri: Intet galleri
Kostplan: Vis kostplan



der er jo forskellige ting der taler for og imod begge dele.
Ved chinups (smalt greb, supineret) er vandringen af overarmen i forhold til kroppen større. og man kan i den sammenhæng også se på det biomekanisk, hvor man kan sige at lats jo, i høj grad er med til nedad/bagud føring af overarmen i selv trækket op til stangen, og arbejder jo så selv sagt excentrisk i sænkningen (håber det er forståeligt hvad jeg har skrevet, og for den sags skyld også korrekt)

Ved pullups (bredt greb, proneret) er vandringen en lille smule kortere kortere, og kommer måske også en smule mere fra siden. men på samme tid er flexionen af albueleddet skabt af biceps, også kortere, da man jo evident ikke bøjer armen i så udtalt grad.

Konklusionen må være at en variation af begge øvelser vil være fordelagtigt, og vil i bedstefald medfører til hyertrofi af lats.
Imellem 'klog' og 'smart' skal der betales bompenge i form af tæsk!
 
Reputation point: 30
 
Indlæg: 2668
Tilmeldt: 12. jun 2010, 15:28
 
Styrkeliste
- Bænkpres: 3.00
- Squat: 1.00
- Dødløft: 2.00
 
Logbog: Vis logbog
Galleri: Intet galleri
Kostplan: Vis kostplan



Nu må i rette mig hvis jeg tager fejl. Men jeg har forstået det på den måde, at forskellen mellem chinups og pullups er, at chinups er underhåndsgreb, og pullups er overhånds greb lige meget hvor bredt man holder?
Brugeravatar
 
Reputation point: 15
 
Indlæg: 1406
Tilmeldt: 13. jul 2011, 23:18
 
Træner her: Sportshøjskolen
 
Styrkeliste
- Bænkpres: 130.00
- Squat: 165.00
- Dødløft: 192.50
 
Logbog: Vis logbog
Galleri: Intet galleri
Kostplan: Vis kostplan



TheDupont skrev:
The Myth of Wide-grip Superiority
One myth that has held back the development of lats the world over is the persistent idea that using a wide grip on chins and pulldowns is the best way to build wider lats. This myth probably has its origins in the fact that using a wide grip on any vertical pulling motion will selectively recruit the smaller upper back muscles like the teres major and minor, the upper portion of the traps, and the rhomboids.

When a bodybuilder feels these smaller muscle groups at the top of the back working, he often assumes he is making his lats wider. But the lats actually originate under the armpits and insert near the waist. Using a wide grip does not provide anywhere near a full range of motion for them. A narrower grip, in contrast, allows both a better stretch and a more complete contraction. If you don’t believe me, pantomime two types of pulldowns right now as you read this, doing your best to contract the lats as hard as possible: a wide-grip pulldown and a narrow, underhand grip. I guarantee you that you will feel a more powerful contraction of the lats with the narrow underhand grip.

In my early career, I experimented with various types of grips, and I found that using a closer grip with the hands either parallel (facing each other) or fully supinated (underhand) actually provided the best contraction and most complete range of motion for the lats. Throughout my Mr. Olympia reign, I never did a single set of wide-grip chins or lat pulldowns. My two choices for vertical pulling were always a narrow underhand grip for lat pulldowns, which I would go up to 400 pounds on, and the Hammer Strength Iso-lateral pulldown machine.


Taget fra en artikel af Dorian Yates. Han mener personligt selv wide grip ikke udvikler lats som et smallere greb gør.


Wide-grip, om så det er pulldowns eller rows, rammer mere i upper-back end narrow-grip, der rammer renere i lats. Rows og pulldowns med bredt, proneret greb aktiverer i høj grad mid-lower trapz, rhomboids, teres grupperne og til dels rear delts.
.. eat, drink, fornicate, defecate, dream, dance, die.
Brugeravatar

 
Reputation point: 1244
 
Indlæg: 11519
Tilmeldt: 27. jan 2010, 01:10
Geografisk sted: The Perimeter
 
Logbog: Vis logbog
Galleri: Intet galleri
Kostplan: Ingen kostplan



A Menace To Chicken skrev:
TheDupont skrev:
The Myth of Wide-grip Superiority
One myth that has held back the development of lats the world over is the persistent idea that using a wide grip on chins and pulldowns is the best way to build wider lats. This myth probably has its origins in the fact that using a wide grip on any vertical pulling motion will selectively recruit the smaller upper back muscles like the teres major and minor, the upper portion of the traps, and the rhomboids.

When a bodybuilder feels these smaller muscle groups at the top of the back working, he often assumes he is making his lats wider. But the lats actually originate under the armpits and insert near the waist. Using a wide grip does not provide anywhere near a full range of motion for them. A narrower grip, in contrast, allows both a better stretch and a more complete contraction. If you don’t believe me, pantomime two types of pulldowns right now as you read this, doing your best to contract the lats as hard as possible: a wide-grip pulldown and a narrow, underhand grip. I guarantee you that you will feel a more powerful contraction of the lats with the narrow underhand grip.

In my early career, I experimented with various types of grips, and I found that using a closer grip with the hands either parallel (facing each other) or fully supinated (underhand) actually provided the best contraction and most complete range of motion for the lats. Throughout my Mr. Olympia reign, I never did a single set of wide-grip chins or lat pulldowns. My two choices for vertical pulling were always a narrow underhand grip for lat pulldowns, which I would go up to 400 pounds on, and the Hammer Strength Iso-lateral pulldown machine.


Taget fra en artikel af Dorian Yates. Han mener personligt selv wide grip ikke udvikler lats som et smallere greb gør.


Wide-grip, om så det er pulldowns eller rows, rammer mere i upper-back end narrow-grip, der rammer renere i lats. Rows og pulldowns med bredt, proneret greb aktiverer i høj grad mid-lower trapz, rhomboids, teres grupperne og til dels rear delts.

I have been fooled! Troede wide grip pull ups var bedst til udviklingen af lats ! gotta do some narrow grip
Brugeravatar
 
Reputation point: 10
 
Indlæg: 3239
Tilmeldt: 10. nov 2010, 08:09
Geografisk sted: Virum
 
Styrkeliste
- Bænkpres: 120.00
- Squat: 140.00
- Dødløft: 200.00
 
Logbog: Vis logbog
Galleri: Intet galleri
Kostplan: Vis kostplan



ckp2906 skrev:
A Menace To Chicken skrev:
TheDupont skrev:
The Myth of Wide-grip Superiority
One myth that has held back the development of lats the world over is the persistent idea that using a wide grip on chins and pulldowns is the best way to build wider lats. This myth probably has its origins in the fact that using a wide grip on any vertical pulling motion will selectively recruit the smaller upper back muscles like the teres major and minor, the upper portion of the traps, and the rhomboids.

When a bodybuilder feels these smaller muscle groups at the top of the back working, he often assumes he is making his lats wider. But the lats actually originate under the armpits and insert near the waist. Using a wide grip does not provide anywhere near a full range of motion for them. A narrower grip, in contrast, allows both a better stretch and a more complete contraction. If you don’t believe me, pantomime two types of pulldowns right now as you read this, doing your best to contract the lats as hard as possible: a wide-grip pulldown and a narrow, underhand grip. I guarantee you that you will feel a more powerful contraction of the lats with the narrow underhand grip.

In my early career, I experimented with various types of grips, and I found that using a closer grip with the hands either parallel (facing each other) or fully supinated (underhand) actually provided the best contraction and most complete range of motion for the lats. Throughout my Mr. Olympia reign, I never did a single set of wide-grip chins or lat pulldowns. My two choices for vertical pulling were always a narrow underhand grip for lat pulldowns, which I would go up to 400 pounds on, and the Hammer Strength Iso-lateral pulldown machine.


Taget fra en artikel af Dorian Yates. Han mener personligt selv wide grip ikke udvikler lats som et smallere greb gør.


Wide-grip, om så det er pulldowns eller rows, rammer mere i upper-back end narrow-grip, der rammer renere i lats. Rows og pulldowns med bredt, proneret greb aktiverer i høj grad mid-lower trapz, rhomboids, teres grupperne og til dels rear delts.

I have been fooled! Troede wide grip pull ups var bedst til udviklingen af lats ! gotta do some narrow grip


Og man kan tage flere kilos med narrow grip, so thats just fine!
Brugeravatar
 
Reputation point: 15
 
Indlæg: 1406
Tilmeldt: 13. jul 2011, 23:18
 
Træner her: Sportshøjskolen
 
Styrkeliste
- Bænkpres: 130.00
- Squat: 165.00
- Dødløft: 192.50
 
Logbog: Vis logbog
Galleri: Intet galleri
Kostplan: Vis kostplan



ckp2906 skrev:
A Menace To Chicken skrev:
TheDupont skrev:
The Myth of Wide-grip Superiority
One myth that has held back the development of lats the world over is the persistent idea that using a wide grip on chins and pulldowns is the best way to build wider lats. This myth probably has its origins in the fact that using a wide grip on any vertical pulling motion will selectively recruit the smaller upper back muscles like the teres major and minor, the upper portion of the traps, and the rhomboids.

When a bodybuilder feels these smaller muscle groups at the top of the back working, he often assumes he is making his lats wider. But the lats actually originate under the armpits and insert near the waist. Using a wide grip does not provide anywhere near a full range of motion for them. A narrower grip, in contrast, allows both a better stretch and a more complete contraction. If you don’t believe me, pantomime two types of pulldowns right now as you read this, doing your best to contract the lats as hard as possible: a wide-grip pulldown and a narrow, underhand grip. I guarantee you that you will feel a more powerful contraction of the lats with the narrow underhand grip.

In my early career, I experimented with various types of grips, and I found that using a closer grip with the hands either parallel (facing each other) or fully supinated (underhand) actually provided the best contraction and most complete range of motion for the lats. Throughout my Mr. Olympia reign, I never did a single set of wide-grip chins or lat pulldowns. My two choices for vertical pulling were always a narrow underhand grip for lat pulldowns, which I would go up to 400 pounds on, and the Hammer Strength Iso-lateral pulldown machine.


Taget fra en artikel af Dorian Yates. Han mener personligt selv wide grip ikke udvikler lats som et smallere greb gør.


Wide-grip, om så det er pulldowns eller rows, rammer mere i upper-back end narrow-grip, der rammer renere i lats. Rows og pulldowns med bredt, proneret greb aktiverer i høj grad mid-lower trapz, rhomboids, teres grupperne og til dels rear delts.

I have been fooled! Troede wide grip pull ups var bedst til udviklingen af lats ! gotta do some narrow grip


Do both, man. Du vil gerne have en stærk upper back, nicht? Varier mellem de forskellige greb.
.. eat, drink, fornicate, defecate, dream, dance, die.
Brugeravatar

 
Reputation point: 1244
 
Indlæg: 11519
Tilmeldt: 27. jan 2010, 01:10
Geografisk sted: The Perimeter
 
Logbog: Vis logbog
Galleri: Intet galleri
Kostplan: Ingen kostplan



A Menace To Chicken skrev:
ckp2906 skrev:
A Menace To Chicken skrev:
TheDupont skrev:
The Myth of Wide-grip Superiority
One myth that has held back the development of lats the world over is the persistent idea that using a wide grip on chins and pulldowns is the best way to build wider lats. This myth probably has its origins in the fact that using a wide grip on any vertical pulling motion will selectively recruit the smaller upper back muscles like the teres major and minor, the upper portion of the traps, and the rhomboids.

When a bodybuilder feels these smaller muscle groups at the top of the back working, he often assumes he is making his lats wider. But the lats actually originate under the armpits and insert near the waist. Using a wide grip does not provide anywhere near a full range of motion for them. A narrower grip, in contrast, allows both a better stretch and a more complete contraction. If you don’t believe me, pantomime two types of pulldowns right now as you read this, doing your best to contract the lats as hard as possible: a wide-grip pulldown and a narrow, underhand grip. I guarantee you that you will feel a more powerful contraction of the lats with the narrow underhand grip.

In my early career, I experimented with various types of grips, and I found that using a closer grip with the hands either parallel (facing each other) or fully supinated (underhand) actually provided the best contraction and most complete range of motion for the lats. Throughout my Mr. Olympia reign, I never did a single set of wide-grip chins or lat pulldowns. My two choices for vertical pulling were always a narrow underhand grip for lat pulldowns, which I would go up to 400 pounds on, and the Hammer Strength Iso-lateral pulldown machine.


Taget fra en artikel af Dorian Yates. Han mener personligt selv wide grip ikke udvikler lats som et smallere greb gør.


Wide-grip, om så det er pulldowns eller rows, rammer mere i upper-back end narrow-grip, der rammer renere i lats. Rows og pulldowns med bredt, proneret greb aktiverer i høj grad mid-lower trapz, rhomboids, teres grupperne og til dels rear delts.

I have been fooled! Troede wide grip pull ups var bedst til udviklingen af lats ! gotta do some narrow grip


Do both, man. Du vil gerne have en stærk upper back, nicht? Varier mellem de forskellige greb.

I do.. Men jeg må indrømme jeg altid har holdt af, at tage nogle tunge pulldowns med urimelig mange sæt
Brugeravatar
 
Reputation point: 10
 
Indlæg: 3239
Tilmeldt: 10. nov 2010, 08:09
Geografisk sted: Virum
 
Styrkeliste
- Bænkpres: 120.00
- Squat: 140.00
- Dødløft: 200.00
 
Logbog: Vis logbog
Galleri: Intet galleri
Kostplan: Vis kostplan



Tilbage til Fitness & bodybuilding




Brugere online

Brugere der læser dette forum: Ingen tilmeldte brugere og 40 gæster